A World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) panel recently dismissed a dispute involving the three-letter domain name SBK.com, finding that the complainant, Smarkets Limited, had engaged in "reverse domain name hijacking."
WIPO has issued an arbitration decision in a cybersquatting dispute, finding that a complaint filed by French environmental consulting firm Blunomy Advisory regarding the domain name blunomy.com constituted “reverse domain hijacking.”
A UDRP dispute case surrounding the domain name Leah.ai has officially come to an end. The expert panel ruled in favor of the current holder of the domain name and determined that the complainant constituted reverse domain name hijacking.
The dispute arbitration case filed by Italian company ITWAY regarding the domain name ICOY.com was formally dismissed, and the arbitration institution even determined that its actions constituted reverse domain name hijacking.
Recently, the dispute over the domain name WaterTimer.com ended with a finding of “reverse domain hijacking”, and the complainant’s attempt to obtain the domain name through the UDRP procedure was explicitly rejected by the panel.
UDRP Decision for the Domain Name GetFixi.app: The Complaint was Dismissed, and the Respondent’s allegation of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” (RDNH) was denied.
Home appliance brand Vorwerk filed a UDRP complaint against the "TM7.com" domain name. Ultimately, the WIPO arbitration panel rejected the complaint and determined that Vorwerk had committed "reverse domain hijacking."
WIPO issued a domain name ruling, dismissing a complaint filed by Australian fintech company Finsure regarding the domain name finsure.com and finding that its actions constituted reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH).
A recent UDRP case involvingNolaElectric.comended in a rare but significant outcome: the panel at WIPO denied the complaint and found the case to constituteReverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH).
In May 2025, WIPO ruled that the US domain name investment company HugeDomains won the Zaddy.com dispute case, and determined that the complainant Zaddy, LLC had engaged in "reverse domain name hijacking."