Ola.com domain name dispute case verdict: Indian online car-hailing company tried to reclaim the domain name through UDRP but failed

Industry News
29 Jul 2025 09:29:59 AM
By:DN platform editor
Ola, a well-known Indian online ride-hailing platform (parent company ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd.), recently lost a high-profile UDRP dispute case and failed to acquire the valuable domain name Ola.com from the existing holder.

India's well-known online car-hailing platform Ola (parent company ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd.) recently lost a high-profile UDRP dispute case and failed to obtain the valuable domain name Ola.com from the existing holder. According to the ruling document published by WIPO, the arbitration panel rejected the complainant's allegations of domain name squatting and confirmed that the current registrant has legal rights to the domain name.

Ola.com domain name dispute case verdict: Indian online car-hailing company tried to reclaim the domain name through UDRP but failed

It was disclosed that Ola had tried to acquire Ola.com privately for more than $1 million, but after unsuccessful negotiations, it turned to the UDRP route, accusing the domain name of malicious registration and use. However, the case trial results showed that Ola failed to meet the three basic requirements required by the UDRP.

In its ruling, the arbitration panel pointed out that the registration of Ola.com predated the registration and brand creation of Ola's trademark, so it could not be determined that its registration was targeted. In addition, the registrant used the domain name for a typical parking page, displaying ads related to the generic word "ola", without directing or misleading specific brands.

Ola.com domain name dispute case verdict: Indian online car-hailing company tried to reclaim the domain name through UDRP but failed

(Ola.com in use)

The complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence to show that the registrant lacked legitimate rights and interests, nor did it show that it used the domain name for obvious malicious purposes. Although the registrant had engaged in domain name investment, such behavior is widespread in the industry and does not automatically constitute malicious intent.

It is worth noting that even if Ola had offered to acquire the domain name at a high price, it did not have a favorable impact on the ruling. The WIPO arbitrator emphasized that the UDRP is not a remedy for failed domain name sale negotiations. Its original intention was to combat real cybersquatting, rather than serving the strategy of companies to obtain domain names at low cost.

Contact Us
contact@dn.com
+86 135-7488-8887
3814848
Please scan the code using WeChat