Support Services:service@dn.com
2025 Dn.com All Rights Reserved
With the second season of Netflix's phenomenal series “Squid Game” set to launch on December 26, 2024, the controversy surrounding its brand is festering hotly. Recently, Netflix successfully defended its brand rights by recovering the
With the second season of Netflix's phenomenal series “Squid Game” set to launch on December 26, 2024, the controversy surrounding its brand is festering hotly. Recently, Netflix successfully defended its brand rights by recovering the domain name Squid-Game.io from a Russian registrant through the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Mechanism (UDRP). This case highlights Netflix's determination to protect its IP and demonstrates the practical application of trademark law in the digital realm.
Background
The Squid-Game.io domain name was registered on September 29, 2021, only shortly after the first season of Squid Game aired. The domain name allegedly resolved to a website associated with episodes of Netflix's Squid Game, offering online mini-games with extensive references to episode content, visual elements, and trademarked information. While the site claimed that the games were free, its data privacy terms indicated that the site operator was profiting from placing ads and collecting user data.
Netflix argued that this behavior not only violated its trademark rights, but also misled consumers and created a false sense of association. As a result, the company filed a complaint on October 3, 2024 with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
Focus of the Dispute
Under the .IO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), Netflix is required to prove three things:
1. The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its trademark:
Netflix presented several trademark registrations as evidence of its rights to “SQUID GAME”. The Panel finds that Squid-Game.io is semantically and visually similar to Netflix's trademark, and in particular that the hyphen and .io suffix in the domain name do not materially affect the recognizability of the trademark.
2. Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name:
Respondent has failed to provide evidence that it has any legitimate interest in the name “SQUID GAME”. In addition, the domain name is being used for content directly related to Netflix episodes and not for original or non-commercial use. Such use is clearly not authorized or justified by Netflix.
3. The Domain Name was registered and utilized in bad faith:
The Panel finds that the Respondent has taken advantage of the popularity of Netflix episodes to attract traffic and profit by imitating the trademark and content. Such behavior is a classic case of registration and use in bad faith.
Final Decision and Revelations
In the absence of a response filed by the Respondent, WIPO found in favor of Netflix and ordered the transfer of the Squid-Game.io domain name to Netflix.
This case demonstrates the legal weapons available to top brands in protecting their intellectual property rights, and also warns domain name squatters that they will face legal penalties for exploiting a well-known brand for their own gain. With the development of the digital economy, companies need to pay more attention to the integrity of their online brands and actively use legal means to protect their rights and interests when necessary.
For Netflix, taking back Squid-Game.io is just one important step in fully protecting one of the world's largest brands. With the end of the third season of Squid-Game just around the corner, the company is likely to monitor any infringements even more closely to ensure that brand value is maximized.
19 May 2025 04:16:20 PMIndustry Information
On May 19th, international cryptocurrency exchange Gate announced a major brand upgrade, centered on the adoption of the global top-level domain Gate.com.
17 May 2025 04:23:00 PMIndustry Information
Registrar Hexonet announced that it will close its business by the end of June, and customer accounts and domain names will be migrated to the Moniker platform. The migration has now entered the substantive stage.
17 May 2025 10:52:34 AMIndustry Information
The domain name MyVehicle.com was recently sold for $105,000. Hiren M. Patel shared the story behind the deal.
16 May 2025 02:14:34 PMIndustry Information
In May 2025, WIPO ruled that the US domain name investment company HugeDomains won the Zaddy.com dispute case, and determined that the complainant Zaddy, LLC had engaged in "reverse domain name hijacking."
In the latest DNJournal report, Rush.ai led the sales list with a price of $300,000, confirming the continued strong performance of .AI domains. Short .com domains such as UIG.com also achieved significant prices.
Industry Information 16 May 2025 01:52:54 PM
According to Domain’s post on the X platform, RemotePay.com was sold for $110,000. The domain was purchased in 2022 for “just over four figures.”
Industry Information 15 May 2025 10:57:46 AM
A domain name dispute caused by the seller temporarily raising the price tenfold ended with the buyer winning the case. After legal intervention, the ownership of PayRewards.com belonged to the Australian company Pay.com.au.
Industry Information 15 May 2025 10:07:53 AM
On May 13, 2025, domain investor Andrew Miller announced on X that he sold the domain Seed.ai for $225,000. This is currently the second highest .ai domain transaction record in 2025.
Industry Information 14 May 2025 10:21:12 AM
Recently, WIPO made a ruling on the two-letter domain name KS.com, determining that the domain name dispute request filed by the complainant in this case lacked factual basis and ruled that it was a reverse domain name hijacking.
Industry Information 14 May 2025 09:53:35 AM
According to NameBio's public data, there have been many high-priced transactions in the domain name trading market in the past few weeks, among which icon.com changed hands for US$12 million, the highest price disclosed so far this year.
Industry Information 13 May 2025 02:00:34 PM