Why are non-.com three letter domain names a bad investment?

Investment 02 Dec 2024 09:07:35 AM By:DN editor
Abstract:

Assuming we choose only the first 500 keywords to combine for a three-word domain name, the number of possible combinations would be 500³ = 125 million. This is a huge number. The more domain names available on the market, the less likely

Non-.com three-letter domain names may seem enticing in the domain name investment market, but they are often not a wise choice from an actual return on investment standpoint. This is mainly attributed to the following reasons:

1. Huge number of portfolios leads to market fragmentation

Assuming we choose only the first 500 keywords to combine for a three-word domain name, the number of possible combinations would be 500³ = 125 million. This is a huge number. The more domain names available on the market, the less likely it is that an individual domain name will be selected. This dilution effect directly affects the investor's probability of success.

In contrast, if two phrases are selected for combination, the first 1,000 keywords can yield 1,000² = 1 million combinations, compared to only 10,000 combinations for the first 100 keywords. Such a reduction means a more focused and targeted selection of domain names, thus increasing the likelihood of a sale.

2. Limitations of non-.com extensions

The value of three-letter domain names drops even further when non-.com extensions are considered. Businesses and individual buyers usually prefer .com as their primary domain name because .com has higher brand trust and user habits. Three-word domain names with non-.com extensions, on the other hand, have little to no real market demand.

In fact, even two-word domain names with non-.com extensions should be avoided unless investors are experienced enough to clearly target their markets and buyers. This further suggests that the investment value of three-word domain names in a non-.com environment is minimal.

3. High Risk Investment with Low Success Rate

While there have been historical “unicorn” cases where three-letter domain names have sold for high prices, these sales are usually a very small portion of the market and are not universal. If you are not an industry veteran, trying to profit from 3-letter domains is almost a gamble, as the odds of winning such domains are not on the side of the average investor.

Conclusion

For domain investors, three-letter domains are not a good choice. They are too fragmented in terms of market size, have low actual demand, and have little to no investment value especially in non-.com extensions. In contrast, focusing on two-word domain names made up of popular keyword combinations or choosing .com domain names with more potential demand is a safer and more rewarding investment strategy.

Investing is a science, and choosing your target market and type of domain name carefully is what will set you apart from the competition.

GX.com sold for $1.2 million, setting a new record for the value of two-letter .com domain names

GX.com sold for $1.2 million, setting a new record for the value of two-letter .com domain names

Recently, the two-letter domain name GX.com was successfully traded for a high price of US$1.2 million, further consolidating the scarcity and high value of two-letter .com domain names in the domain name market.

Industry Information 13 Mar 2025 03:03:31 PM

ICANN plans to phase out .su domain name in 2030

ICANN plans to phase out .su domain name in 2030

ICANN announced that it will stop using the Soviet-era .su country code top-level domain (ccTLD) in 2030. The domain has been in use since 1990 and currently has about 100,000 registered domain names.

Industry Information 12 Mar 2025 02:37:04 PM

ICANN Board Geographic Restrictions Take Effect, North American Candidates Denied Nomination

ICANN Board Geographic Restrictions Take Effect, North American Candidates Denied Nomination

At ICANN 82, the ICANN Nominating Committee (NomCom) confirmed that applications from candidates in the North American region had been politely rejected due to geographic restrictions.

Industry Information 11 Mar 2025 04:15:21 PM

Double.com successfully sold for $980,000

Double.com successfully sold for $980,000

Recently, Mark Ghoriafi once again facilitated an important domain name transaction - successfully selling Double.com for a high price of US$980,000.

Industry Information 11 Mar 2025 10:24:45 AM

The attempt to register the MIT.school domain name failed, and the

The attempt to register the MIT.school domain name failed, and the "pseudo-protection" behavior was rejected

In the field of domain name investment and use, the UDRP case involving the MIT.school domain name is a typical example with great warning significance.

Industry Information 10 Mar 2025 03:22:33 PM

EYQ.AI sold for $50,000, AI domain name transaction premium 92%

EYQ.AI sold for $50,000, AI domain name transaction premium 92%

Another iconic domain name transaction occurred in the field of artificial intelligence - EYQ.AI was sold for US$50,000, while its corresponding .COM domain name EYQ.com was listed for approximately US$26,000.

Industry Information 10 Mar 2025 11:27:12 AM

Why are non-.com three letter domain names a bad investment?