Support Services:service@dn.com
2025 Dn.com All Rights Reserved
In a domain name battle that has generated widespread attention, a dispute between two Texas pool construction companies has led to a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) case. The case involved a dispute between Pools123 Houston LLC over
In a domain name battle that has generated widespread attention, a dispute between two Texas pool construction companies has led to a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) case. The case involved a dispute between Pools123 Houston LLC over Pools123Texas.com, a domain name registered by Aquamarine Pools of Texas.
At issue is a Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) complaint filed by Pools123Houston LLC. Despite the fact that there has been a business relationship between Complainant and Respondent for many years, Complainant has failed to fully disclose this in its filings. To further complicate matters, Respondent has provided evidence that they owned the Pools123.com domain name long before Complainant registered the POOLS123 trademark. In response, Complainant's counsel argued that their client was the registrant, triggering further scrutiny by the Panel.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) panel found indications of reverse domain name hijacking during its proceedings. In its decision, the Panel stated: “Given what appears to be a long history of dealings between the Complainant and its client and the Respondent, the Complainant has failed to honestly disclose this relationship. The Complainant has not acknowledged the existence of business dealings between the parties, nor has it acknowledged that the Respondent's 'pools123.com' website existed long before they registered the POOLS123 trademark. Complainant's failure to withdraw the complaint within the mutually agreed upon suspension period resulted in Respondent having to expend significant resources defending the false complaint.”
Chamberlain Hrdlicka represented the Complainant in this case and ESQwire.com PC provided legal support to the domain name owner. The Panel's decision not only sheds light on the legal complexities involved in domain name contests, but also highlights the need for transparency and honesty when dealing with similar cases.
17 May 2025 04:23:00 PMIndustry Information
Registrar Hexonet announced that it will close its business by the end of June, and customer accounts and domain names will be migrated to the Moniker platform. The migration has now entered the substantive stage.
17 May 2025 10:52:34 AMIndustry Information
The domain name MyVehicle.com was recently sold for $105,000. Hiren M. Patel shared the story behind the deal.
16 May 2025 02:14:34 PMIndustry Information
In May 2025, WIPO ruled that the US domain name investment company HugeDomains won the Zaddy.com dispute case, and determined that the complainant Zaddy, LLC had engaged in "reverse domain name hijacking."
16 May 2025 01:52:54 PMIndustry Information
In the latest DNJournal report, Rush.ai led the sales list with a price of $300,000, confirming the continued strong performance of .AI domains. Short .com domains such as UIG.com also achieved significant prices.
According to Domain’s post on the X platform, RemotePay.com was sold for $110,000. The domain was purchased in 2022 for “just over four figures.”
Industry Information 15 May 2025 10:57:46 AM
A domain name dispute caused by the seller temporarily raising the price tenfold ended with the buyer winning the case. After legal intervention, the ownership of PayRewards.com belonged to the Australian company Pay.com.au.
Industry Information 15 May 2025 10:07:53 AM
On May 13, 2025, domain investor Andrew Miller announced on X that he sold the domain Seed.ai for $225,000. This is currently the second highest .ai domain transaction record in 2025.
Industry Information 14 May 2025 10:21:12 AM
Recently, WIPO made a ruling on the two-letter domain name KS.com, determining that the domain name dispute request filed by the complainant in this case lacked factual basis and ruled that it was a reverse domain name hijacking.
Industry Information 14 May 2025 09:53:35 AM
According to NameBio's public data, there have been many high-priced transactions in the domain name trading market in the past few weeks, among which icon.com changed hands for US$12 million, the highest price disclosed so far this year.
Industry Information 13 May 2025 02:00:34 PM
On May 12, Escrow.com announced the 2025 Master of Domains Award list, which is to recognize the top ten domain brokers with the highest transaction volume in 2024 to recognize their outstanding performance in the domain industry.
Industry Information 13 May 2025 10:40:46 AM